On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 at 08:18:00 +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 08:52:05PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > > It appears that your previous NMU of arpwatch introduced a couple of RC bugs > thanks for the heads-up, i wasn't aware of these bug reports. the bug > tracker doesn't CC the NMU email address. perhaps it should.
The BTS doesn't really know who has NMU'd a package, and can't know whether
new bugs were caused by your upload or unrelated; pts-subscribe(1), from
devscripts, is a useful way to subscribe to packages you've NMU'd (although
with its default settings it would have unsubscribed you by now anyway).
> > (As an aside: NMUs that are new upstream versions should be versioned
> > like 2.15a-0.1 to indicate that they're NMUs.)
>
> and i'll change the version number to 2.15a-0.2
Too late, that version number is less than the one you uploaded, so it'd be
rejected at upload; 2.15a-1.1 would be correct, now.
Thanks for looking at this again,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
