On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 03:03:33PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 08:44:20PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: > > A fixed version is just waiting for some tests > > regarding the probably messed up Endian detection (I need to create some > > usefull test and send it to some PPC/sparc/... owner) > > What can go wrong with endian.h and using > #if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN > ? > > Bastian
What could go wrong is that the system must have been broken for
quite some time without anyone noticing ot some other additional
mecanism in place. However the Byteordercheck is already RFSed and
waits for a sponsor.
Regards
Christoph
--
/"\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731
\ / Campaign : CaCert Assurer
X against HTML : Debian Maintainer
/ \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/
http://www.christoph-egger.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
