On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:23:10AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: > No, kbuild is already suggested, but because there are other ways to build the > package I see no reason to depend on kbuild. The preferred way of building a > module nowadays is dkms which does not need kbuild for virtualbox-ose.
Why is dkms the preferred way? It integrates the modules into the system much uncleaner than the old-fashioned ways that build .debs and then proceed to install them. And it doesn't allow to separate "building" and "running" on two different systems. Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
