On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 04:59 +0100, Cristian Greco wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:06:15 +0000
> "Matthew W. S. Bell" <matt...@bells23.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > reopen 557519
> > thanks
> >
> > The .desktop file and the relevant application belong in the some
> > package. Obviously.
>
> Hi Matthew,
> I'm not going to move .desktop file nor the menu icon from 'deluge' to
> 'deluge-gtk', because this is a non-sense compared to upstream choice to
> provide four different UIs binaries, deluge{,-web,-console,-gtk}.Sorry, how is providing four different client binaries a nonsense? They can be installed and run separately. They 'deluge' executable itself seems to be a small script designed to be run from the command line, with command line arguments to select the required UI. The menu system is designed to provide menus for GUIs. In what way is it useful to not have a desktop/menu entry in the /only/ client that is actually used from the GUI? Possibly, one might want a menu item for the deluge web client, but you know what? It can have another menu entry, especially as there is not way to specify when using the menu item anyway? Matthew W.S. Bell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
