Hello, On sekmadienis 29 Lapkritis 2009 18:56:13 Henry-Nicolas Tourneur wrote: > Indeed, but what I also see is that libgpod4-nogtk has no cover > capabilities. > > So my question is the following : what will happen with Amarok if if try to > deal with Ipod covers and that the gtk library isn't installed ? If we just > have libgpod4-nogtk ? > > For me, the ideal situation would be for Amarok to detect that it's working > with the nogtk version and so, just display to the user : functionnality > not available, please install libgpod4, for eg.
If Amarok upstream implemented this, it would be fine, but I'm not doing this myself. However, I have another choice: to split ipod plugin off into its own package. I will think about this and decision will greatly depend on your following answer. > Personnaly, I got no Ipod and I'm running on KDE 4.3 So do I. > so I don't really care > about that functionnality and I'm trying to get rid of libgtk (only use by > one software on my system : Amarok). I guess that I'm not alone, so giving > the user some choice would be really great. libgtk is harmless contrary to real *gnome* libraries and packages which may hijack KDE desktop. So please give me some good real-world reasons (excluding religious anti-GTK ones) why you want to get rid of libgtk. -- Modestas Vainius <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
