Markus Steinborn schrieb:
Yet I did not test it but from a rough look they did it in almost the
same way as I did.
Well, the standard situations seem to work now. But once again I managed
to construct a situation where the SUID-Bit is lost using setfacl
version 2.2.49:
-------------- cut here --------------------
r...@acer:/tmp/test>ls -l
insgesamt 28
-rwsr-xr-x 1 bin root 22984 30. Nov 10:37 passwd
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 89 30. Nov 10:38 passwd.acl
r...@acer:/tmp/test>cat passwd.acl
# file: passwd
# owner: root
# group: root
# flags: s--
user::rwx
group::r-x
other::r-x
r...@acer:/tmp/test>/tmp/1/acl-2.2.49/setfacl/setfacl --restore passwd.acl
r...@acer:/tmp/test>ls -l
insgesamt 28
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 22984 30. Nov 10:37 passwd
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 89 30. Nov 10:38 passwd.acl
r...@acer:/tmp/test>
-------------- cut here --------------------
As I do not have debian available to test: Could you verify whether that
this bug is present in debian unstable or not?
Greetings from Germany
Markus Steinborn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
