tags 559449 + confirmed thanks Hi Patrick,
thanks for your bugreport with patch!
On Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> I'd like to use piuparts but neither with creating a new chroot on every
> run, nor by unpacking a tarball on every run, but with LVM snapshots.
> There is a bug report about adding schroot support, but I didn't see any
> benefit of using schroot in contrast to just using LVM snapshots,
less requierements (=no lvm) to use it?
> so
> I implemented the latter. My patch is attached. Feel free to apply it
> or if you have any questions/comments get back to me.
Looks good to me, will apply. Right now I just don't get how this is related:
@@ -1845,7 +1873,7 @@
help="No meaning anymore.")
parser.add_option("--debfoster-options",
- default="-o MaxPriority=required -o UseRecommends=no -f
-n apt
debfoster",
+ default="-o MaxPriority=required -o UseRecommends=no -o
UseEssential=yes -f -n apt debfoster",
help="Run debfoster with different parameters (default:
-o
MaxPriority=required -o UseRecommends=no -f -n apt debfoster).")
Could you also please provide a patch for piuparts.1.txt? ;-) Extra bonus
points for a
debian/changelog entry ;-)
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
