On 2009-12-12 16:40, Norbert Preining wrote: > reassign 560791 luatex > retitle 560791 diversion mess still not cleaned up completely > thanks > > On Sa, 12 Dez 2009, Török Edwin wrote: > >> Setting up luatex (0.46.0-6) ... >> texlive-base is not ready, cannot create formats >> Removing `diversion of /usr/bin/texdoc to /usr/bin/texdoc.notluatex by >> luatex' >> Removing `diversion of /usr/share/man/man1/texdoc.1.gz to >> /usr/share/man/man1/texdoc.notluatex.1.gz by luatex' >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This appears to be the problem >> >> [...] >> > > Wasn't there something > Cleaning up luatex diversion mess: > - remove old dead /usr/bin/texdoc link > - reinstantiate from forgotten diversion texdoc.notluatex > in the log? > > If not I have to fix again the postinst script for luatex. > > Best wishes >
This is all I have in my apt's log regarding luatex: $ sudo grep luatex /var/log/apt/term.log luatex depends on texlive-base-bin. Preparing to replace luatex 0.40.6-1+b1 (using .../luatex_0.46.0-6_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement luatex ... Selecting previously deselected package texlive-luatex. Unpacking texlive-luatex (from .../texlive-luatex_2009-4_all.deb) ... Setting up luatex (0.46.0-6) ... Removing `diversion of /usr/bin/texdoc to /usr/bin/texdoc.notluatex by luatex' Removing `diversion of /usr/share/man/man1/texdoc.1.gz to /usr/share/man/man1/texdoc.notluatex.1.gz by luatex' Setting up texlive-luatex (2009-4) ... Best regards, --Edwin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
