On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 07:36:37PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 07:16:54PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > The package mentions alot of binary packages, but only > > uclibc-source seems to be getting build. I don't know if > > this is intetional or not. > > It is intentional. The actual library packages are built on the uclibc > architectures (e.g. uclibc-linux-armel).
So uclibc should never be build on any of the buildds? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
