Le Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:24:36AM +0000, Mark Brown a écrit : > severity 561432 important > kthxbye > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 01:21:47PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Package: zlib > > Severity: serious > > Please be a bit more realistic with severities. Obviously this should > be fixed but making what is essentially a paperwork issue release > critical seems disproportionate. > > > Would it be acceptable to simply quote README.contrib (patch > > attached), or is a more detailed description needed? Once a solution > > is found for zlib, I will paste the results in velvet. > > What else might you imagine would be needed?
Hi Mark, I share your point of view on the real importance of the issue, but formally, a policy violation is a serious bug, so that is the severity I used for opening. I also opened a serious bug on my package (velvet). So please accept my apologises if the severity was a bit shocking, but this is the way it is by following the documentation. The FTP team have received a copy of the bug so I hope they will comment on how to solve it in a time-efficient manner. I hope including README.contrib is enough. If they want more work, I will propose another patch. I do not mean to syphon your time, but since I expect that your package's copyright file is likely to be used as a template each time a new package containing a convenience copy of zlib is prepared, I would like to help its copyright match the current requirements. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
