Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for esteidutil (versioned as 0.9.18-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/02, according to DevRef §5.11.1. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
Regards. diff -u esteidutil-0.9.18/debian/changelog esteidutil-0.9.18/debian/changelog --- esteidutil-0.9.18/debian/changelog +++ esteidutil-0.9.18/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +esteidutil (0.9.18-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Added missing #include to src/utility/opensslObj.h, fixes + FTBFS with gcc4.4 (Closes: #505420) + + -- David Paleino <da...@debian.org> Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:34:06 +0100 + esteidutil (0.9.18-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream, fixing camel-case binaries only in patch2: unchanged: --- esteidutil-0.9.18.orig/src/utility/opensslObj.h +++ esteidutil-0.9.18/src/utility/opensslObj.h @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #pragma once #include "cardlib/DynamicLibrary.h" //bad .. #include "Setup.h" +#include <stdint.h> #if HAVE_OPENSSL #include <openssl/ssl.h> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
