Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 24/12/09 at 12:04 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
>> I suggest there might be something wrong with the amd64 build box
>> you're using as the buildd report [1] shows that 0.9.5.dfsg-5 was built
>> successfully Dec 12th. I've also re-downloaded the 0.9.5.dfsg-5 version
>> from the mirrors and rebuilt under a pbuilder chroot and it built
>> successfully as well. The -4 version of the package had a problem in the
>> debian/rules that caused this behavior but it was fixed in the -5 release.
>
> Could you please diff your log with mine, to see if the problem was
> possibly caused by different build-dep versions ?
>
I'm building on i386 as my amd64 boxes are currently still offline
along with my hppa and alpha machines. The official amd64 buildd I sent
the URL that was available for the log. When looking through it I didn't
see any failures. However that log format and your log format are
completely different and do not lend themselves to diff comparison.
Jeremy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
