Am Dienstag, den 29.12.2009, 14:45 +0100 schrieb Yves Lambert: > Package: reiserfsprogs > Severity: normal > > AFAIK the bug was due to optimized libc6 library that is in /usr/lib > okay reiserfsprogs should not get out of the busybox but libc6 should > not also. > If nobody but me did experiment the bug I think it can be closed or > else be affected to libc6: > What make me think that i686 libc6 library is guilty : I ran debug > build with /usr that was mounted and I could not reproduce the > segfault. Optimized (i686) libc6 is on /usr/lib instead of /lib. That > is not a proof, of course... >
Ok thanks for your mail. But it still would be helpful to know where it actually segfaults. It wouldn't be a problem to reopen the bug and reassign to libc6 for me, but I can imagine its maintainers just ask you the same or directly close it or reassign back. Or maybe it has been fixed in the meanwhile with 2.10 Your initial report has libc6 2.9-20 whereas now you seem to have libc6 2.10.2-2. -- Felix Zielcke Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
