Frank Küster wrote: > Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Frank Küster wrote: >>> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> /etc/texmf/dvipdfm/config >>> >>> This is still accessible: >>> >>> $ ll /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 >>> 2005-07-26 11:58 /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config -> >>> /etc/texmf/dvipdfm >> >> Why is it not owned by any package then? > > It isn't a conffile, it is handled by maintainer scripts (actually by > ucf). > > $ grep dvipdfm/config /var/lib/ucf/hashfile > 75b66a225e26a7e91d71a4f6bda08fb4 /etc/texmf/dvipdfm/config
Thanks for the explanation. Now I see a few things clearer. I still don't know why /etc/texmf/dvips/config.builtin35 is treated differently from /etc/texmf/dvips/config.download35, but I assume you kno what you are doing. ;-) cheerio ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]