On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:53:17AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Jeroen van Wolffelaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Can you please comment on the below?
> 
> The OpenMosix packages were intentionally kept out of sarge because
> upstream's not terribly interested in the 2.4 patches and they're
> working on a 2.6 version.  The 2.6 version is expected to be somewhat
> better in a number of regards, and is available in an alpha-state
> currently.  The kernel patch itself might actually be workable enough
> for unstable but I'm afraid the userspace is pretty much missing still
> and some things have been moved to userspace that are reasonably
> important (such as load balancing across the cluster).

Ah, I see.
 
> I'd rather it not be removed from unstable (the only thing it's in,
> after all), but mainly because I'd rather not have to go through the NEW
> queue again when I feel the 2.6 patches/userspace are suitable to 
> package for unstable.

Well, NEW processing nowadays really isn't a problem, and only takes a
minor amount of time (max a few weeks, typically a lot faster). Besides
you're probably going to need NEW anyway, for 2.6 reasons (or maybe not,
but regardless).

I think it's better to match reality and to actually drop the package
until it's ready to be reintroduced, especially since it might take a
bit until it's ready for use again. As long as this package remains in
unstable, people will notice it and try to install it.
 
> I suppose if Micah just can't stand it I could package and upload the
> 2.6 stuff soon, but I'd rather wait till it's a bit more
> developed/stable.

Well, having alpha-level software in unstable is costing a bit of QA &
release time, and we *are* trying to cut down on 'not ready for any
stable release at this moment' software.
 
> > Micah, it's appreciated when making such type of requests to
> > X-Debbugs-Cc the maintainer in question.
> 
> Aww, but then I'd get to comment on it and I might ruin his little
> vendetta/pity party.

No need for hard feelings here, we're all working together on the same
OS.

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to