severity 564074 important
thanks
Niko Tyni wrote:
I'm attaching a testcase. The bug seems to have crept in with 5.10.1
and is still present in bleadperl.
Nice work for producing this short test-case!
I'm not going to start a severity war, we'll do our best to fix this for
the release anyway. I'll just note that `important' has traditionally
been the severity for perl bugs that crash the interpreter and don't
affect many packages.
Neither `grave' or `critical' fit the bill IMO. The ftpmirror package
is very much related to perl which rules out `critical', and perl is not
unusable (or mostly so) for everybody, otherwise we'd have got a lot
more bug reports.
If Eugene thinks this should be RC he's can of course set it to `serious'
as a maintainer.
I thought like this too when I initially set the severity to
'important', so I'm setting it again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
