[I'm still mostly VAC, but reading some mails in order to not be bumped on the head by the sheer mass of them in a couple of days...]
Jean-Sébastien Trottier <j...@qualipsoft.com> wrote: > texdoc -d reveals: > texdoc debug-files: Configuration files are: > texdoc debug-files: absent /home/jst/texmf/texdoc/texdoc-bin.cnf > texdoc debug-files: absent /home/jst/texmf/texdoc/texdoc.cnf > texdoc debug-files: absent /home/jst/texmf/texdoc/texdoc-dist.cnf > texdoc debug-files: absent > /usr/local/share/texmf/texdoc/texdoc-bin.cnf > texdoc debug-files: absent /usr/local/share/texmf/texdoc/texdoc.cnf > texdoc debug-files: absent /usr/share/texmf/texdoc/texdoc.cnf > > However, texlive-base installs texdoc.cnf here: > /usr/share/texmf-texlive/texdoc/texdoc.cnf I think this is a bug in texdoc, or some library it uses. If a file is searched in a texmf tree, it should use kpathsea, or at least try to emulate its behavior. In other words, it should also search the file in TEXMFCONFIG and TEXMFSYSCONFIG. The latter is the proper place for the file in Debian. Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Debian Developer (TeXLive) VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
