* Antonio Radici <anto...@dyne.org> [20100109 15:43]:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:47:07AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >  ... this is a change that was introduced recently, what is the
> > rationale for that change? Why can't the old behavior stay? Changing
> > commandline handling in that way breaks backward compatibility in a
> > serious way and unfortunately also several scripts that people use over
> > the years to send mails with attachments from the commandline.

> >  Would it be possible to revert that change to the old behavior?

[...]

> Rather than rushing and asking upstream to do some changes I would prefer to
> gather some user feedback about this new behavior, and then we could decide 
> with
> more data on our hands.

I just stumbled upon this issue on a system that was upgraded from
Lenny to Squeeze and where:

  mutt -a foo1 -a foo2 $EMAIL

used to work just fine in a cronjob until now.

It's a *very* annoying change. Especially since it's poorly
documented (I can't find a word in /usr/share/doc/mutt/NEWS.gz nor
in NEWS.Debian) and that this behaviour was changed inside 1.5.*
versions instead of doing that inside a major version bump (like
1.5->1.6).

regards,
-mika-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to