Raphael Hertzog <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Olivier Berger wrote: >> I doubt the watch file will notice (which may be fine considering that a >> 0.29 version is out too), but there's a new version of zim, rewroten in >> Python available. > > I started packaging the 0.42.beta3 yesterday night just before the release > of 0.42... so I'll take care of it. >
Cool. > (I'm subscribed to the upstream ML) > >> It would be great to have it packaged in Debian, although 0.29 would be >> a priority, before. Should it be packaged under the same name, >> considering the language change ? > > I will keep the same name yes. And since upstream work goes into pyzim, I > don't see the need to package 0.29 right now. > Maybe that would be a safe precaution in case the python version goes crazy, so I'd prefer to see 0.29 in unstable than nothing maybe ? Thanks for your efforts, Regards. -- Olivier BERGER (OpenPGP: 1024D/B4C5F37F) http://www.olivierberger.com/weblog/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
