> > Is there any prospect of getting this bug resolved? I'd like to use > > the facility for NTLM hashes (-format:NT). The patch has been > > available for almost 2 years, doesn't look too complicated, and would > > be widely useful. Thanks, Andrew. > > Well, the john maintainer does not want to include patches that are not > provided by upstream in the sid package.
I understand, but this seems *extremely* conservative. As I said, the patches have been available for almost two years, they're not that complicated, and they do work. And after all, we're not talking about the kernel here. It's just a user-space program to compute and try some hashes against a provided list. What's the big risk in case there's a bug? And it wouldn't even be a bug in an existing feature-- it would be a new feature, experimental if you like. > However, we might include these > (and other) patches in the 'experimental' branch (which is providing > currently the 1.6.36 version but will provide 1.6.38 soon) Thanks, this would be very helpful. Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
