On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:33:47PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 18/01/10 at 23:59 +0000, Jurij Smakov wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 06:58:18AM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Package: src:ruby1.9.1 > > > Version: 1.9.1.378-1 > > > Severity: serious > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > ruby1.9.1 FTBFS on sparc with the following error: > > > > make[2]: Leaving directory > > > > `/build/buildd-ruby1.9.1_1.9.1.378-1-sparc-KMvrBv/ruby1.9.1-1.9.1.378' > > > > compiling bigdecimal > > > > Aborted > > > > make[1]: *** [mkmain.sh] Error 134 > > > > make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 > > > > dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 > > > > > > Also, we have #545345 (ruby1.9.1: test suite fails on sparc). For which > > > upstream said (in the redmine bug) that Sparc is no supported. > > > > > > Sparc porters, could you help us investigate this? > > > > > > This is extremely worrying, because we still need to transition all ruby > > > 1.9.0 packages to 1.9.1 (so we can drop 1.9.0) before the squeeze > > > release. Not releasing ruby1.9.1 on sparc isn't really an option because > > > of all the reverse-dependencies. > > > > I can't reproduce neither FTBFS nor test failure on my sparc box > > running up-to-date sid, tried it a couple of times today. I can make > > the build log and binary packages available, if needed.
Josip, are you running lebrun these days? Can you try reproducing the failure there and getting more information about it (logs are not very informative)? I'm a bit reluctant to do a porter upload knowing that the package cannot be built on buildds for some reason. Best regards, -- Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
