* Michael Prokop <[email protected]> [20100129 04:29]: > * vogu00 <[email protected]> [20091006 08:38]: > > Michael Prokop wrote: > > >> arches in the future, and how hard it would be to add it?
> > > Guy: any information from your side? > > Stack backtracking: Have a look at function ToolSignalBacktraceHandler > > in toolsignal.cpp. I already made it architecture independant but I > > never tried it on architectures like sparc, for instance. > > However, I have an old PowerBook G4 at my disposal where succesfully > > build libguytools and guymager powerpc packages. Just add "powerpc" > > to the list of architectures in debian/control. > Thanks - adjusted in git: > > http://git.debian.org/?p=forensics/libguytools.git;a=commit;h=a9262ba8e75bcc583480227026c9a048ad1ccf23 I just uploaded libguytools1 (1.1.1-1) which additionally includes powerpc in the list of supported architectures. I'll try to reach people with access to different platforms (thanks for the hint, Kurt) so we can check out which archs could be supported as well. regards, -mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
