On 2010-02-01 Florian Weimer <[email protected]> wrote: > * Andreas Metzler:
>> This was also discussed upstream, ending with: >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> On 2009-12-18 Kerstin Espey wrote >>> Am Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2009 schrieb Tom Kistner: >> [...] >>>> Looking through the code, these are the most likely causes for the >>>> failures: >>>> 1) The message has more than 512 headers. >>>> 2) The message contains a single line longer than 16k bytes. >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> Looks like restricting the error to main_log is the right thing to do. > Thanks for tracking this down. > Can this be used to bypass DKIM-based filters? This would be a bit > problematic. Hello, I do not think so, for exim the message should look as if it did not have any DKIM signature, which can be accomplished a lot more easily by inserting a message without signature. Sure, it would not detect a invalid DKIM signature for the message, but exim would not mark it as checked and valid either. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
