Hi Dann,
On 10 February 2010 at 11:12, dann frazier wrote:
| Source: quantlib
| Version: 1.0.0~20100112-1
| Severity: serious
|
| >From a recent build attempt on hppa:
| [...]
| ======================
| Testing QuantLib 1.0b1
| ======================
| *** glibc detected ***
/build/buildd-quantlib_1.0.0~20100112-1-hppa-H12qa6/quantlib-1.0.0~20100112/test-suite/.libs/lt-quantlib-test-suite:
free(): invalid pointer: 0x0093e938 ***
| make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop.
| make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
| make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop.
| E: Caught signal 'Terminated': terminating immediately
| make[3]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop.
| make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
| make[3]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop.
| make: *** [test-stamp] Terminated
| make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
| Build killed with signal TERM after 300 minutes of inactivity
300 minutes is a long time. What do you suggest we do? I already skip the
tests here in debian/rules:
cpu := $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_CPU)
[...]
test: test-stamp
test-stamp: build-stamp
ifeq "$(findstring $(cpu), m68k arm armeb mipsel mips)" ""
-LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(CURDIR)/ql/.libs $(MAKE) check
-LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(CURDIR)/ql/.libs $(MAKE) benchmark
endif
touch test-stamp
It may make sense to add hppa to the list. What do you think? Could you try
a build without this 'make check; make benchmark' step ?
Dirk
--
Registration is open for the 2nd International conference R / Finance 2010
See http://www.RinFinance.com for details, and see you in Chicago in April!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
