Mike Hommey wrote: > I think dh_install should, even if it doesn't install anything for these > packages, take the $package.install files into account and don't complain that > the files that would normally be installed in the packages that are not being > built.
This seems like a good idea. > OTOH, as this would be a problem with the "old" way of doing things (a binary > target depending on binary-arch and binary-indep targets), this should > probably > only be done when using dh. I don't follow why that would be a problem? -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
