On 25.02.2010 00:03, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Michael Biebl <[email protected]> writes:
>> [reproduction recipe]
> 
> Thank you for the additional information.  You still did not
> provide a direct answer to my questions from the cited email.
> Could you do that?  Here they are again:
> 
> To me, it seems like it would be reasonable for aclocal to create
> the "m4" directory if it is being asked to copy files into it,
> that is, if aclocal is being invoked with --install.  But
> autoreconf as far as I can tell never invokes aclocal with
> --install, so this would not help.

If m4 does not exist at the time aclocal is run and --install is not given,
maybe aclocal should simply issue a warning and proceed?
Simply failing at this point is counterintuitive imho.

> Actually, I am now a little confused.  If your package does not
> have any of its own M4 files in m4/, and it does not use
> libtoolize, and it does not expect --install to be used with
> aclocal, then where are the files in m4/ eventually coming from?
> Perhaps I just misunderstand (sometimes the autotools still catch
> me by surprise after many years).

I do use libtool, but libtoolize is run *after* acloclal.


Cheers,
Michael

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to