Matthijs Kooijman <[email protected]> writes: >> Maybe it should not be described as "free" if it is indeed non-free? > Well, it is "free" under some definition of free, but you are right that this > might be misleading. Perhaps "freely available" would be better?
Freely distributable maybe? > At any rate, we've uploaded the intial release already, so we'll have to fix > this in a subsequent upload after it went through NEW. Sure it is not a critical bug at all. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
