Hello Adrian, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
> this bug is a replacement for #351812 that was unfortunately already > archived when I upgraded backup2l. Sorry for closing this bug. The upstream author have said to me, he will not fix it in the way you had written in #351812. So I have closed your bugreport. Now I know it is better to let a bugreport open with tag "wontfix". > Runnning a backup shouldn't modify the system. > > mutt let's me cycle through all folders containing new email. > > Without my patch, after running a backup I might miss new email in > folders, especially in folders with infrequent new email. > > You might call it "a matter of taste", but for me that is a clear bug > with bad real-life consequences. With these statements you say it is a bug. I think it would be the best I set your bugreport to Severity "minor" and forward your bugreport to a new bugreport on http://sf.net/projects/backup2l/ to the upstream author. And the patch in the (old) bugreport #351812 should be forwarded to a patchreport on http://sf.net/projects/backup2l/. Is this way o.k. for you? Fondest regards, Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
