Ondřej Surý wrote: > 2010/2/25 Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org>: >> * Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org>, 2010-02-25, 20:07: >>> had Debian alredy switched to python2.6 as default version? >> No, not yet. If it did, this bug would have severity serious. > > I didn't see this transition announced to debian-announce (hint), so I > didn't know that it's even in preparations. Reading debian-release > archives gave me some hints. > > I'll probably fix that after the transition is done, or with new > upstream release. Those lines in debian/rules are just ugly hack to > workaround upstream deficiency.
Then use debian/pyversions or similar ways to limit the package to build with supported Python versions. Just using the default Python version is not the proper way for packaging Python modules and programs. Python 2.5 is not gone, so just fix your packaging please. -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79 ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
