Hallo Joachim. Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Sáb Fev 27 13:04:45 -0300 2010: (...) > Am Freitag, den 26.02.2010, 23:24 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e > Silva: > > Do you thing it worths to try a build on all architectures that doesn't have > > GHCi, knowing that they will fail, for all new versions of these packages, > > just > > to make sure that, when ghci works on them, they'll build too? I don't > > think > > it's a good exchange here. > > but it’s not what the Architecture field is for, AFAIK. The correct > thing to do is to have the non-working package/arch combination entered > in the not-for-us database of the buildd system, so that the package > will not be tried for building. But this is, also AFAIK, the job of the > porters.
Besides it, do you think we should use any or the architecture list in the Architecture: field? If the architectures are in not-for-us, the build will not be tried anyway, so I don't see a reason to change it to any. Auf Wiedersehen. (...) -- marcot http://marcot.iaaeee.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
