-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 13/03/2010 22:52, Christopher Martin wrote: > Has anyone actually explained the situation to the ftp-masters and asked > for an opinion/exemption? It seems that moonlight in Debian is being > given up on rather easily. > > Either an effort should be made to package moonlight 2 and ship it with > the next release, or else the ftp-masters reject it and should then be > asked to remove moonlight from the archive rather than be forced to > support increasingly ancient software. The ftp-masters can then explain > to our users why moonlight just isn't good enough for Debian...
I spoke with Ganneff (i think, or someone else in #debian-ftp), who flat-out said he'd REJECT it if it contained as much bundled stuff as it does. I agree with your points though. removing what's already in the archive might be a good plan if there's no chance of movement on accepting 2.2-1. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLnCmQAAoJEMkPnLkOH60MwEsIAM4dA3ZW9oG2FQgxTG6vVr+O QMmmUH8/jhJZHKzO0cUuDEBPi5JayuEtp+7w97YpIiYMzSrr/bRznc485sX9ryPr 9V3AeHFDB8dd6V39lmWyvivOPjza7KuxzlxqiYENzSznrwanXhNXa/BRhd6hx1T1 fK41XF0eucuDzLaFIDm5AOph+w+EgEcjcEQWudQqNs2dpVyQzIFJfNOAGs52RLEI NK51dMa2eEm5dnz27DwaFkuuYi4LMzagaXVRXLlWsVUl/TeFn+LVZ9FGXeoDP0Dj A6ARFIVz/foBimyf95lOz1Ty+Fw9k8SA6sD2Pd6ez86XcDyp9FA9TXvnhgP9k7w= =sR8J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
