On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, dann frazier wrote:
> I don't know the scheme language, but google suggests that this is a
> syntax error and, looking for similar patterns in other code, I came
> up with the following fix. Seems to work (tested on hppa).
Hrm. Now I feel embarassed, because I had already fixed it with this
patch (which is what I *thought* I had uploaded) which was what I
tested on ppc.
Thanks for pointing it out.
> --- lilypond-2.12.3.orig/scm/lily.scm 2010-03-19 14:18:47.000000000 +0000
> +++ lilypond-2.12.3/scm/lily.scm 2010-03-19 03:54:13.000000000 +0000
> @@ -674,8 +674,8 @@ PIDs or the number of the process."
> (open-file (if (string-or-symbol? (ly:get-option 'log-file))
> (format "~a.log" (ly:get-option 'log-file))
> (if (access? "/dev/tty" W_OK)
> - ("/dev/tty")
> - ("/dev/null"))) "a") #f))
> + "/dev/tty"
> + "/dev/null")) "a") #f))
> (do-measurements (ly:get-option 'dump-profile))
> (handler (lambda (key failed-file)
> (set! failed (append (list failed-file) failed)))))
>
>
>
Don Armstrong
--
First you take a drink,
then the drink takes a drink,
then the drink takes you.
-- F. Scott Fitzgerald
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
