Hi,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 09:10:13PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> @@ -670,7 +670,8 @@
> */
> FCode (p4_nofp_f_trunc_to_s)
> {
> - double h = *FSP++;
> + double h = *FSP;
> + SP = (double *)SP + 1;
> *--SP = (p4cell) h;
> }
I'm wondering if this is not a typo. Shouldn't FSP be incremented instead
of SP?
Note: I've not tested it, I just mistyped a bug number and found this one.
Please forgive me if it was intentional.
Best Regards,
--
Nekral
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
