On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:24:36PM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 16:33 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > > Did you remove gdm from plymouth's init script LSB header? Othwerise > > the > > init system will stop plymouth way before gdm. > > The init script is called gdm3 in the new package, so it isn't having > any effect. You're right. I though it'd provide gdm and gdm3 but it doesn't. In this case you should disable the start target alltogether in plymouth's init script.
> > On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 17:42 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > I also wonder whether this can actually work somothly if X is not > > started on the first VT. > > > > To be done correctly, this requires a VT manager, and we don’t have one. > > That's a good question, when I have a little more free time I will try > out the patches and see if the VT switch is a problem. Well shouldn't this work out if we launch plymouth on the same VT as gdm3? Upstream has quiet a bunch of new code for this in 0.8.x. Cheers, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
