Hello, On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 03:51:31PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > > Currently, split mode is moderately useful, because it is based on the > assumption than people want to have their split pofiles as > a source for their translations.
Indeed, the goal of the split mode is ... to split. > The attached patch reuses existing code for split mode, but uses > the assumption that the central pofile is the one we want to use for > translating (and we keep the central pot around for the same reason). > Split pofiles can then be considered as pure products of the po4a run (and > manual changes to them are lost - if you don't want that, you want the > existing split mode). > > It can be used eg. as follows: > > [po4a_paths] $master/l10n/$master.pot $lang:$master/l10n/.$lang.po > centralpot:l10n/messages.pot central_$lang:l10n/$lang.po I do not really understand what is the difference between using the split mode with your patch, and not using the split mode. Best Regards, -- Nekral -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
