Le Dimanche 11 Avril 2010 22:57:01 Marco d'Itri, vous avez écrit : > On Apr 11, Didier Raboud <did...@raboud.com> wrote: > > Squeeze should really ship a udev that incorporates the upstream commit > > 4dd9b291354e76f34b0d6d7b5c3b28d03a624418 (post-151). > > The freeze is still not close, what about you wait for the next upload? > > > In private discussion with Betavine and usb_modeswitch upstreams, it > > appears rather clearly that usb-modeswitch is now the tool supposed to > > handle the switching of those flip-flop devices: 61-mobile-action.rules > > conflicts with usb-modeswitch. > > Guess what? I had similar discussions as well.
Then that's great! I intended this bugreport as notifier-reminder for you: your answer shows me that you are informed and aware of the issue, which is all I wanted to make sure of. As I can't know when udev's upstream will push new version tarballs [but you most probably know], I would have preferred to see this bug closed with the "new upstream" upload of udev, but I'm not in the mood for BTS ping-pong and it's your package afterall. Cheers, OdyX -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian Maintainer (DM). CH-1020 Renens did...@raboud.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
