Bill, Agree, we need a Nightly build that exercises the parallel build for wrapping.
We are also missing Windows and Mac Nightly builds for the wrapping. Luis ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Bill Hoffman <bill.hoff...@kitware.com>wrote: > On 4/18/2010 4:26 PM, Luis Ibanez wrote: > >> >> Gaetan, Brad, Bill, >> >> Is there something we could do to make possible >> to build the ITK Wrappers using CMake's parallel >> building capabilities ? >> >> Thanks for any advice, >> >> >> > This has been fixed/broken sooooo many times.... No one reports the > errors back. It should be pretty easy to fix, just add a few > add_dependencies statements. In fact, Luis you and I looked at this about 6 > months ago, and there was an ifdef windows thing. Because the windows build > would not work at all since VS always does parallel these days. So, I > would first look for add_dependencies calls in the ITK cmake lists files. > If they are conditional on WIN32 get rid of that and always do it. If > that is not the problem, I would need a list of the errors in the parallel > build. > > After that we need a dashboard that does a parallel build of ITK with > wrapping so this does not break again, and again, and again.... :) > > -Bill > > Luis >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------- >> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Lucas Nussbaum >> <lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net <mailto:lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net>> wrote: >> >> Source: insighttoolkit >> Version: 3.16.0-2 >> >> Hi, >> >> insighttoolkit takes a very long time to build. On my setup, the 10 >> packages that take the most time are (with build duration in seconds): >> >> axiom 7036 >> qt4-x11 7050 >> python3.1 7255 >> gcc-4.4 7774 >> installation-guide 8141 >> mysql-dfsg-5.1 8445 >> life 9397 >> openoffice.org <http://openoffice.org> 11265 >> >> insighttoolkit 14791 >> atlas 29688 >> >> Please support building the package in parallel to leverage multicore >> CPUs or SMP systems (see policy 4.9.1 for details). >> >> I've seen the note in debian/rules saying that parallel building of >> wrappers is broken. Is there really nothing we can do? Couldn't it be >> possible to build most of the package in parallel, and then build the >> wrappers sequentially, for example? >> -- >> | Lucas Nussbaum >> | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net <mailto:lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net> >> >> http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | >> | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr <mailto:lu...@nussbaum.fr> >> >> GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Debian-med-packaging mailing list >> debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org >> <mailto:debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org> >> >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging >> >> >> > > -- > Bill Hoffman > Kitware, Inc. > 28 Corporate Drive > Clifton Park, NY 12065 > bill.hoff...@kitware.com > http://www.kitware.com > 518 881-4905 (Direct) > 518 371-3971 x105 > Fax (518) 371-4573 >