Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote: > yes, that's OK for me. After I have done the defined steps in March, now the upstream developer of backup2l have answered both patch messages. Please see the following links:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2981133&group_id=39012&atid=424169 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2981138&group_id=39012&atid=424169 Both answers link to the following "Feature Request" from the year 2003: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=827723&group_id=39012&atid=424170 So I see the upstream developer doesn't want to merge your patch. Fondest regards, Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
