On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 02:59:05PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> In the revision 6, a dependency on libapache2-mod-apreq2 was added.

Yes, due to #319614, which says exactly the opposite of your bug report. :-)

> Since it is perfectly possible to use libapache2-request-perl without
> libapache2-mod-apreq2 (e.g. in CGI scripts)

That seems like an odd use-case to me. Wouldn't people normally use CGI.pm
and friends instead if they do not have Apache?

> this dependency should be downgraded to "Recommends" or even better:
> "Suggests".  The current dependency forces all users of the perl glue to
> install apache 2.

Well, it is Perl glue to an Apache module, after all...

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to