On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 02:35:17PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> In that case the deficiency is in the fact that no reflog preserves the
> intermediate state of the index, not the fact that you might be allowed
> to do it. Strictly speaking there is no intermediate ref to log, but a
> synthetic commit could be created for this case just like a stash but
> stored in the current branch's reflog.
Possibly, but I don't see how is this better than the check - it is less
user friendly, most importantly because user that has not seen this
twice has no idea that anything *was* saved to a reflog.
Are there valid user scenarios where you customize your index, then want
to override that using -a without thinking twice?
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
When I feel like exercising, I just lie down until the feeling
goes away. -- xed_over
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
