Le mercredi 28 avril 2010 à 14:33 +0200, Sandro Tosi a écrit : > block 529478 with 577875 > thanks > > Hello Adam, > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 07:33:47AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 10:29 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > Le jeudi 15 avril 2010 à 10:11 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > > > > > > > ********************************************************************************* > > > > > UNABLE to CONFIGURE with GIVEN OPTIONS (see configure.log > > > > > for details): > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > You set a value for --with-blas-lib=<lib> and > > > > > --with-lapack-lib=<lib>, but ['-lblas-3gf'] and ['-llapackgf-3'] > > > > > cannot be used > > > > > ********************************************************************************* > > > Sounds like this bug is due to a recent update of blas/lapack. > > > -lblas-3gf & -llapackgf-3 have been removed from alternative. > > > I looked for usage of this but I didn't know that people were still > > > using it. > > > Replacing -lblas-3gf => -lblas & -llapackgf-3 => -llapack should fix it. > > > > Thanks Sylvestre. I've done that for another package, and petsc has a > > few open bugs, so this will push me to fix a bunch of things. > > > > This may have to wait a week or so. I'll get to it as soon as I can. > > could you please give it a look as soon as possible? this bug is > blocking the resolution for petsc4py RC bug (that in turn is blocking > the py2.6 transition). Adam, I can do it for you if you need. (it is kind of my "fault" here)
Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
