أحمد المحمودي dijo [Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:48:47PM +0300]: > On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > "Harm others" is a vague term that can be applied to a wide range of > > activities usually considered ok[1]. > > I am indeed discussing this matter with upstream. That license terms > need to be clear not vague.
Without getting deeper in the licensing of Othman itself, would you consider the text of the Coran itself to be DFSG-free? I _think_ that any religious text can only be distributed verbatim, not modified in any way - That is completely legitimate, as it has been debated over and over regarding the IETF RFCs. -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
