Hi, On Fri May 07, 2010 at 09:53:38 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Martin Zobel-Helas | 2010-05-07 07:57:31 [+0200]: > > >Hi, > Hi, > > >I do not support the creation of this list. > I see. > > >Rational: > >We already have the mostly same constalation for eg. arm or mips* > >architectures. There is architecture arm which is binary incompatible to > >armel, or big and little endian mips. All those architectures do use the > >their common port mailinglist, even though their CPUs do not share the > >same instruction sets. > Okay. > > >I hope i was verbose enough. If not, please speak up. > I though it would be better not to bother the powerpc mailing list > especially in the early stage and since we not an offical port. > > However if you disagree so be it. So lets close the bug and we move to > the debian-powe...@d.o list.
Me disagreeing doesn't automaticaly mean you can't ask for the list. It was just my 2ยข. That is my personal opinion, not a opinion other listmasters automaticaly need to share. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <zo...@debian.org> Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
