Hi,
At Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:55:16 +0900,
Hideki Yamane <[email protected]> wrote:
> >Umm, I'd like to know your real intention of the email.
> >Do you request me something?
>
> This is because maintainer seems to be busy to track this, I just
> want to hear your opinion to deal with this.
dvipsk-ja is very useful. I want to resolve this bug with to the
freeze deadline(too late?).
> I think it's better to join texlive because it would also solve
> Bug#562440 "dvipsk-ja: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find
> library libkpathsea.so.4 needed by debian/dvipsk-ja/usr/bin/dvips
> (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')".
I don't think so. AFAK this patch is l10n support, not i18n, so I
hesitate to join texlive-bin package...
BTW, I create dvipsk-ja package using upstream patch and upstream
texlive-bin_2009 src. See this url:
http://www.gfd-dennou.org/member/uwabami/software/tmp/
# I want to upload mentors.debian.net, but It seems the new queue of
# this server is temporary down...
This package is 4 lintian warning(ancient-libtool. this warning is
unrelated to dvipsk) and piuparts clean.
Requeset for comment.
* Using upstream texlive-bin source. this is large file.
Should I separate dvipsk source from upstream tarball?
* Now I tested some personal tex documents. Please use
dvipsk-ja and check result PostScript.
Regards,
---
Youhei SASAKI <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
GPG fingerprint:
4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07
1024/DSA: 8BF1 ABFE 00D2 526D 6822 2AC6 13E0 381D AEE9 95F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
