found 562945 1.0.0 found 562945 1.1.1 notfound 562945 1.1.1+nmu1 found 562945 1.1.2 severity 562945 serious thanks
Hi Gerit,
On Donnerstag, 25. März 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 25. März 2010, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> I think this is very wrong. See below...
> > Hi, this is by intention, I reverted the NMU. runit-run should only be
> > installed if actively confirmed again.
> ITYM s/installed/activated/
You never replied to this...
> > For non-interactive and
> > automated installations either debconf should be installed and
> > preseeded, or no debconf installed any `echo y` written to stdin.
>
> That's all fine and dandy, but still, the installation of the package
> should succeed, even if "yes" is neither preseed or otherwise indicated.
actually, policy says s/should/must/
> I won't do the -devel@ and/or TC limbo right now, as I don't have the time
> at the moment to fight random developers who think they can ignore
> fundamental aspects of policy for their pet packages, while 25000 packages
> do just fine...
I now have the time ;-)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
