severity 583655 wishlist
thanks

Am 29.05.2010 10:41, schrieb yellow:
> Package: partimage
> Version: 0.6.8-1
> Severity: important
> 
> Hello
> 
> Lot of users would like to use dd instead of partimage format to backup, and 
> then do a tar.gz of it to compress

They can do that of course.

> 
> You program should propose this,

What do you mean by that exactly?
- Should the package description mention dd+tar (which would be weird imho)?
- Should partimage simply become a frontend for dd+tar? Why would you
want that? Running dd+tar is simple enough.

Please be more specific what exactly you propose and why you think this
important. I'd say, people installing partimage do know what the tool is
good for and what not.

Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to