severity 585568 wishlist thanks On 06/11/2010 10:05 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > While your hooks solve the problem for systems using initramfs-images > it's still open for systems without initramfs at all (which is totally > legal I guess).
is it? there are many things that don't work properly once you don't use an initrd with initramfs-tools. i'm not sure it's worth the effors to support non-initramfs related things, in particular because the fsck -a goes away at some point anyway (am currently thinking about just applying the patch to add -a and be done with it). > 1) I guess it must be an init script that reverse depends (LSB header > X-Start-Before) on "$local_fs". correct. > 2) Does btrfsctl automatically load the btrfs module, or do we have to > manully do that before? (which is somehow ugly IMO) off-hand i'd say no, but didn't check (rebooting now sucks :). > 4) Is there a good way to prevent doubled scanning, if that already > happened in the initramfs? the initramfs script could touch something in /var/tmp (or somewhere like that), and the initscript could skip if the file is found. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [email protected] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
