tags 585559 unreproducible thanks Re: Jon 2010-06-11 <[email protected]> > The only conclusion I can draw from this is that the hcache backend is > mostly irrelevant to IMAP performance. Both are far superior to no > caching and the performance difference between the two is largely > insigificant compared to the overall runtimes caused by network latency.
I cannot confirm that here. Using IMAP with dovecot, opening a 40k folder from gdbm is horribly slow (10s?, only slightly faster than initially building the cache for tokyocabinet), while the same folder from tokyocabinet is pretty fast (~2s). I guess this highly depends on filesystems, networking lag, etc. Christoph -- [email protected] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
