On 14-6-2010 16:05, Michal Čihař wrote:
Because I can not reproduce this. All I can reproduce is the small
testcase, which really does not prove anything.
Sorry, maybe I was just not clear enough: There is definitely leak in
your original setup, which seems to be caused either directly by xcache
or by it's interactions with other modules.
But I failed to see this in some minimal test case and I have no idea
how to reproduce your problem as the leak does not happen anywhere
where I tested it.
I wish I had a simple test case but I'm afraid I don't.
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
