Hi! * Sune Vuorela <[email protected]> [100628 12:20]:
> I discussed it with Benoit and we agreed that it should not have been > introduced as kprogress, but instead as a goto-fai-qprogress or a more saying > name what the package is actually about. Okay, it is nice that you talked and agreed. [..] > KDE might or might not introduce a more generic progress bar application, > should kdialog --progressbar not suffice. So let us resolve the possible > conflicts as early as possible. However, I don't think that KDE applications may claim the letter "k" as their "namespace". Or should we also remove packages like kvm-source, klogd and keepalived? Best Regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
